Litigation

We choose cases that have
the potential to change the law
or the way it’s interpreted.

Matsumoto v. Labrador</p>
<p>May 2024</p>
<p>Attorneys and plaintiffs gather outside the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Open Cases

Since our founding in 1978, we’ve worked on more than 500 cases. If you’re looking for information about one of our closed cases, please contact us at info@legalvoice.org.

Little v. Hecox

Our challenge to Idaho’s anti-trans sports law, which harms cisgender women, trans women, and nonbinary people who play on women’s sports teams.

Legal Counsel for Youth and Children v. State of Washington

Our challenge to Initiative 2081, which threatens youth privacy and inclusive education.

Matsumoto v. Labrador

Our challenge to Idaho’s abortion travel ban, which seeks to prevent youth from getting legal abortion health care in other states.

Perkins v. State of Montana

Our challenge to HB 121, one of the broadest anti-trans “bathroom bans” in the country.

Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawai’i, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky v. State of Alaska

Our challenge to an Alaskan law that blocks qualified health care professionals from providing abortions.

Seyb v. Idaho Board of Medicine

Our challenge to Idaho’s two abortion bans, which endanger the lives of pregnant people who face medical emergencies.

Amicus Curiae Briefs

Amicus curiae (friend-of-the-court) briefs are written by parties who are not involved in a case but have expertise to offer to the court. The list below shows our amicus briefs related to open cases. If you’re looking for information about a brief related to a closed case, contact us at info@legalvoice.org.

Branson v. Washington Fine Wine & Spirits

Our brief seeks to protect Washington’s pay transparency law. The law is critical to closing the wage gap for women and people of color.

Planned Parenthood v. State of Montana

We wrote in opposition to three anti-abortion laws in Montana that harm survivors of intimate partner violence.

FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

We wrote in support of the FDA’s decision to expand access to mifepristone, one of two drugs most often used for medication abortions. Related to Washington v. FDA.

Moyle v. United States

We wrote in opposition to Idaho’s near-total abortion ban, which blocks emergency rooms from performing abortions to protect the health of pregnant people.

Open Cases

 

Since our founding in 1978, we’ve worked on more than 500 cases. If you’re looking for information about one of our closed cases, please contact us at info@legalvoice.org.

Little v. Hecox

Our challenge to Idaho’s anti-trans sports law, which harms cisgender women, trans women, and nonbinary people who play on women’s sports teams.

Legal Counsel for Youth and Children v. State of Washington

Our challenge to Initiative 2081, which threatens youth privacy and inclusive education.

Matsumoto v. Labrador

Our challenge to Idaho’s abortion travel ban, which seeks to prevent youth from getting legal abortion health care in other states.

Perkins v. State of Montana

Our challenge to one of the broadest anti-trans “bathroom bills” in the country.

Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawai’i, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky v. State of Alaska

Our challenge to an Alaskan law that blocks qualified health care professionals from providing abortions.

Seyb v. Idaho Board of Medicine

Our challenge to Idaho’s two abortion bans, which endanger the lives of pregnant people who face medical emergencies.

Amicus Curiae Briefs

Amicus curiae (friend-of-the-court) briefs are written by parties who are not involved in a case but have expertise to offer to the court. The list below shows our amicus briefs related to open cases. If you’re looking for information about a brief related to a closed case, contact us at info@legalvoice.org.

Branson v. Washington Fine Wine & Spirits

Our brief seeks to protect Washington’s pay transparency law. The law is critical to closing the wage gap for women and people of color.

Planned Parenthood v. State of Montana

We wrote in opposition to three anti-abortion laws in Montana that harm survivors of intimate partner violence.

FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

We wrote in support of the FDA’s decision to expand access to mifepristone, one of two drugs most often used for medication abortions. Related to Washington v. FDA.

Moyle v. United States

We wrote in opposition to Idaho’s near-total abortion ban, which blocks emergency rooms from performing abortions to protect the health of pregnant people.